<!--?php
if ( function_exists('register_sidebar') )
    register_sidebar(array(
        'before_widget' => '',
        'after_widget' => '',
        'before_title' => '<div class="title">',
        'after_title' => '</div>',
    ));
?-->

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for cFILMc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cfilmc.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cfilmc.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ponyo by Jera</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/ponyo/comment-page-1/#comment-2308</link>
		<dc:creator>Jera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=583#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>This told me a few things I did not know yet so I thank you for explaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This told me a few things I did not know yet so I thank you for explaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Antichrist by poisonrouge</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/antichrist/comment-page-1/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>poisonrouge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=719#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>Excellent review to help flesh out the details of the film which may not be fully understood. I want to mention that during one scene, He&#039;s hand is covered in what looks like ticks. This might explain the hallucinatory aspects of He&#039;s point of view shortly after their arrival at Eden. Very few films are so provocative as to have me thinking of it for a few days after the viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent review to help flesh out the details of the film which may not be fully understood. I want to mention that during one scene, He&#8217;s hand is covered in what looks like ticks. This might explain the hallucinatory aspects of He&#8217;s point of view shortly after their arrival at Eden. Very few films are so provocative as to have me thinking of it for a few days after the viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Serious Man by falstaff</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/a-serious-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>falstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=659#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>This is a variant of the story in the biblical book of Job. The title of the movie is a play on Job 1:8, &quot;a righteous man&quot;. 
God in Job speaks from out of a &quot;whirlwind&quot; which does of course work its way into the story.. ;)
Great movie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a variant of the story in the biblical book of Job. The title of the movie is a play on Job 1:8, &#8220;a righteous man&#8221;.<br />
God in Job speaks from out of a &#8220;whirlwind&#8221; which does of course work its way into the story.. <img src='http://cfilmc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Great movie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best films of the year &amp; decade by Jason</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/best-films-of-the-year-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=730#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>Ranking in general is a silly practice. I don&#039;t know what it means to say one movie is eight and the other nine. The list represents how I was felling on that particular day, which doesn&#039;t means much. For my thought, both Antichrist and Mulholland Dr. are essential films, as well as other films that didn&#039;t appear within the confines of the list. Yet Synecdoche, New York is at the top, because it portrays what it means to be alive in the twenty first century. Years from now people will be able to look back at this film and know what it felt like to live at the turn of century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranking in general is a silly practice. I don&#8217;t know what it means to say one movie is eight and the other nine. The list represents how I was felling on that particular day, which doesn&#8217;t means much. For my thought, both Antichrist and Mulholland Dr. are essential films, as well as other films that didn&#8217;t appear within the confines of the list. Yet Synecdoche, New York is at the top, because it portrays what it means to be alive in the twenty first century. Years from now people will be able to look back at this film and know what it felt like to live at the turn of century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best films of the year &amp; decade by Paul</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/best-films-of-the-year-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=730#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>I find it odd that &lt;em&gt;Mulholland Dr.&lt;/em&gt; is missing from the list.  It&#039;s certainly better than &lt;em&gt;Antichrist&lt;/em&gt;, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it odd that <em>Mulholland Dr.</em> is missing from the list.  It&#8217;s certainly better than <em>Antichrist</em>, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cove by Raul</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/the-cove/comment-page-1/#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=642#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>Great Film. Stop dolphin slaughter!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Film. Stop dolphin slaughter!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the Loop by He said, She said</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/in-the-loop/comment-page-1/#comment-1897</link>
		<dc:creator>He said, She said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=500#comment-1897</guid>
		<description>I think that this film isn&#039;t meant to just be &#039;a funny comedy&#039;. It is more than that; a black comedy. I enjoyed how the film works as a commentary of modern governments - the spin and manipulation. In that respect it can&#039;t really be faulted in my eyes. Our blog might explain my viewpoint better: http://theysaidreeladvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/in-loop-directed-by-armando-iannuchi.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this film isn&#8217;t meant to just be &#8216;a funny comedy&#8217;. It is more than that; a black comedy. I enjoyed how the film works as a commentary of modern governments &#8211; the spin and manipulation. In that respect it can&#8217;t really be faulted in my eyes. Our blog might explain my viewpoint better: <a href="http://theysaidreeladvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/in-loop-directed-by-armando-iannuchi.html" rel="nofollow">http://theysaidreeladvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/in-loop-directed-by-armando-iannuchi.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bright Star by Erotiek Shop</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/bright-star/comment-page-1/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>Erotiek Shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/bright-star/#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>i have seen this movie, i really loved it, great review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have seen this movie, i really loved it, great review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Antichrist by kcouto</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/antichrist/comment-page-1/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>kcouto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=719#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>Well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best films of the year &amp; decade by Jason</title>
		<link>http://cfilmc.com/best-films-of-the-year-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cfilmc.com/?p=730#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>Spielberg is consistently under-appreciated because he makes popular films. That&#039;s an obvious enough statement, as well as to say that he has a considerable body of work that contains several formidable masterpieces. He has made about half a dozen films that are the greatest in the history of cinema. Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Artificial Intelligence stand high as his crowning achievements. I won&#039;t needlessly defend the former, but rather state a few sentiments toward the latter.

I have watched A.I without the sound on and the camera work is mindbogglingly exquisite. Spielberg, prone to sweeping shots and a camera that is always kinetic, is somehow able to convey the right amount of motion, direction, and speed to fully bring about the emotions and elucidate the themes inherit in the individual characters. However, turning off the sound denies one the experience of watching one of the saddest films I have experienced. Consider the protagonists. One is a boy designed to replace the designer&#039;s son and purchased for a similar reason of consolation. It&#039;s a robot designed to replace love as is the second protagonist, gigolo Joe, another robot designed to love, this time focusing on the carnal pleasures of love, as opposed to David&#039;s emotional affinities. Why do humans need to design robots to love? Now the greater themes come into play. Spielberg and Kubrick are commenting on humankind&#039;s inability to connect, to feel with one another. Humans design these robots and eventually they take over and the humans have died out, because while humans understand the concept of humanity they are unable to prove it through practice. Hence, the humans hold flesh fairs where they cheer the destruction of the machine, while the advanced machines, ruling in a post human environment, are contemplative and serene, lamenting the loss of humans, and cherishing the discovery of David who will be their key into the past world of living organisms.  

Some argue against the success of the collaboration between Kubrick and Spielberg. I have yet to see a finer teeming in cinema between two distinct minds. Kubrick is the nihilist, who believe in the achievements of man as superior to man himself, while Spielberg is the humanist, who specifically is compassionate toward the innocence of children, placing Spielberg solely in the ranks of Truffaut in that regard. Together they crafted a film that is both tender and brutal, and I relish their achievement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spielberg is consistently under-appreciated because he makes popular films. That&#8217;s an obvious enough statement, as well as to say that he has a considerable body of work that contains several formidable masterpieces. He has made about half a dozen films that are the greatest in the history of cinema. Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Artificial Intelligence stand high as his crowning achievements. I won&#8217;t needlessly defend the former, but rather state a few sentiments toward the latter.</p>
<p>I have watched A.I without the sound on and the camera work is mindbogglingly exquisite. Spielberg, prone to sweeping shots and a camera that is always kinetic, is somehow able to convey the right amount of motion, direction, and speed to fully bring about the emotions and elucidate the themes inherit in the individual characters. However, turning off the sound denies one the experience of watching one of the saddest films I have experienced. Consider the protagonists. One is a boy designed to replace the designer&#8217;s son and purchased for a similar reason of consolation. It&#8217;s a robot designed to replace love as is the second protagonist, gigolo Joe, another robot designed to love, this time focusing on the carnal pleasures of love, as opposed to David&#8217;s emotional affinities. Why do humans need to design robots to love? Now the greater themes come into play. Spielberg and Kubrick are commenting on humankind&#8217;s inability to connect, to feel with one another. Humans design these robots and eventually they take over and the humans have died out, because while humans understand the concept of humanity they are unable to prove it through practice. Hence, the humans hold flesh fairs where they cheer the destruction of the machine, while the advanced machines, ruling in a post human environment, are contemplative and serene, lamenting the loss of humans, and cherishing the discovery of David who will be their key into the past world of living organisms.  </p>
<p>Some argue against the success of the collaboration between Kubrick and Spielberg. I have yet to see a finer teeming in cinema between two distinct minds. Kubrick is the nihilist, who believe in the achievements of man as superior to man himself, while Spielberg is the humanist, who specifically is compassionate toward the innocence of children, placing Spielberg solely in the ranks of Truffaut in that regard. Together they crafted a film that is both tender and brutal, and I relish their achievement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

