Filed under: Drama
Gaze up at a bright moon, and then follow a line of moonbeams down from the sky, away from the horizon, across a lake, and into the enraptured blue eyes of Sérephine (Yolande Moreau), who is digging up muck with her bare hands. From this first shot of the film it’s hard to tell whether the plump middle-aged woman has found something or is still looking, if she’s in agony or in ecstasy. Next, watch the red and orange glistening sunrise on the Gothic cathedral that in the summer of 1914 still towers over the French town of Senlis, but has lost its spiritual power over the citizens—except for Sérephine, who quietly and joyously sings a hymn and burns an offering. It has been less than two minutes, and you already have peered into Sérephine’s soul.

Sérephine (based on painter Sérephine Louis) keeps a careful guard over her inner life so that she can work as a maid in a boarding house without calling attention to herself. Her biggest complaint about her job isn’t that it’s strenuous and demeaning, but that it takes up so much of her time. She wants more time to climb trees, pick flowers, and most of all, to paint frantically late into the night. Wilhelm Ulde (Ulrich Tukur, also based on a real person), who stays in the boarding house, also tries to keep a low profile so that he can have some peace. Parisian socialites fawn over him because he’s the art dealer who discovered Rousseau and Picasso. Less sophisticated folks taunt him because he’s German. Germans won’t accept him for being gay.
Sérephine and Wilhelm can fool everyone but each other. When they first meet, Wilhelm takes a very brief glance at Sérephine’s ankle, almost as if he were aroused by her. Willhelm tries to get to know Sérephine better and she also seems curious about him, but the social barriers are too strong to overcome. He tries to make conversation, and she keeps answers as short and obedient as she can. When he finds out that she’s an artist and sees her work, he thinks that she can become a famous artist in the “naïve” untrained style. He somehow knows that her paintings of plants have been inspired by past misfortune. He grows upset with her in a very master of the house kind of way, and sits her down for a lecture. When he realizes that he is quite literally talking down to her, he bends down, looks up at her, and continuous to talk condescendingly.
Both the boarding house and the woods lack electric light, and there seems to be a clue in every corner, behind every shadow. As she cleans Wilhelm’s room, Sérephine uncovers the books, papers, and drawings that mark him as at least an intellectual, if not an artist. While Wilhelm doesn’t hug and sing to trees like Sérephine, he takes a stroll, and finds her bathing in a stream deep in the woods. These silent moments of discovery, are when the relationship between Wilhelm and Sérephine is at its best. As a side note, I hate how the word “relationship” has become so heavily associated with romantic relationships. A romantic relationship ought to be called a “romance”—it sounds much nicer, and it frees up the word “relationship” to describe what there is between Wilhelm and Sérephine, who are very close to each other but are neither friends nor lovers.
Sérephine is a lot of what I wish I could be. She is simple but wise. She is a steadfast believer in the God of the Bible. She is in touch with nature. And most of all, she is an artistic genius. As Wilhelm becomes her patron and moves her to Paris, part of me wants her to continue scrubbing floors in obscurity, as if the purpose of her life were to live out my bourgeois fantasy of the starving artist’s life. This is an unfair expectation.
As A.O. Scott points out in his review, a story about an artist’s response to success runs a huge risk of not saying anything new, but this one does. Sérephine does have her time in the spotlight, but it’s the type of short stint that makes someone hungry for more attention but only able to get it from oneself. At first I thought that Sérephine’s newfound self-love was overemphasized. Her quiet, charming hymns sung to herself become booming off-key oratorios that everyone in the house can hear. Her thankfulness to God for inspiring her becomes a love of herself for being the inspired one. She stops making her own paints. She begins to strike poses, looking the way she thinks an artist should look. She wants a big house, fancy things, and servants of her own. Her transformation may seem too extreme to be believable, but this is only because she hasn’t completely lost herself. When compared with the arrogance expressed by Wilhelm and his protégé/lover Helmut (Nico Rogner), we find that Sérephine’s arrogance lacks nuance because it’s unnatural for her. No matter how much she changes, she can never get to the point at which she can get lost in it and start spewing nonsense like Wilhelm’s “I sell to collect. I don’t collect to sell” or Helmut’s “I don’t care about fame—that’s for after I’m dead.” But neither can she return to her naïveté. I want to say that she’s been corrupted but I can’t. Wilhelm may be a bit full of himself, but he treats her very well, providing her with whatever she needs both for her work and for her personal satisfaction. She may not have been hurt or corrupted, but she has been put into a situation in which there’s nowhere for her to bare her soul with that ambiguous stare.
-Robert Henderson
No Comments so far
Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>